Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQpswBAuNPsJXM+Nj=-bqC2L2vCdUZVf6Bx98C90p2msQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >> This sentence is actually wrong, a feedback message is never sent with >> the feedback message. > > Eh? "A feedback message is never sent depending on the status interval". > I think this looks basically fine, though I'd omit the short option > for it. There are only so many letters in the alphabet, so let's not > use them up for developer-convenience options. No objections to that. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: