Re: Increasing timeout of poll_query_until for TAP tests
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Increasing timeout of poll_query_until for TAP tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQnJ7f20ELH_fvWDghBEfR8xhxMQTng2rTg4OE4L_4ZAw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Increasing timeout of poll_query_until for TAP tests (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Increasing timeout of poll_query_until for TAP tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> > Why not capture both items in a single select, such as in the attached >> > patch? >> >> Let me test this.... >> [... A while after ...] >> This looks to work properly. 12 runs in a row have passed. > > Okay, applied that way. > > BTW, one-line long queries look awful in that perl code. I don't > propose to change anything now, but I propose that long queries are > split using here-docs in new code, > > $node->safe_psql(<<EQ); > SELECT foo > FROM bar > EQ Yep, that would be a good idea. I didn't know this grammar existed. Or use qq() directly. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: