Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQn3=T69RDBSMwn9UYLjLdJe+1p+jaOz-o1z9tLG-x8hQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > That lets you make assertions about replication behaviour. It was built for > BDR and I think we'll need something along those lines in core if/when any > kind of logical replication facilities land, for things like testing > failover slots, etc. > > The patch is at: > > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=2ndquadrant_bdr.git;a=commit;h=d859de3b13d39d4eddd91f3e6f316a48d31ee0fe > > and might be something it's worth having in core as we expand testing of > replication, failover, etc. Maybe there is an advantage to have it, but that's hard to make an opinion without a complicated test case. Both of those things could clearly work with each other at first sight. PostgresNode can set up a set of nodes and this patch would be in charge of more complex scenarios where the same connection or transaction block is needed. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: