Re: LSN as a recovery target

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 24 August 2016 at 05:50, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Everything else looks in good order.
>>
>> Committed. Thanks.
>
> Thanks for the commit!

By the way, what has been committed does not include the patch adding
the parsing context in case of an error as wanted upthread. Perhaps
that's not worth adding now as there is the GUC refactoring
potentially happening for the recovery parameters, so I don't mind
much. Just that's worth mentioning.
-- 
Michael