Re: pg_regress writes into source tree
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_regress writes into source tree |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQ_HmwgxL+tC7ftjDxQt-dK2KyhtCzfj9uvi_8-z101JQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_regress writes into source tree (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_regress writes into source tree
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > > On 12/18/2014 06:05 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> >> On 12/18/2014 03:02 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera >>> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Another thing in that patch was that I had to add the sql/ directory to >>>> the source tree, but other than that .gitignore file it was empty. >>>> Maybe pg_regress should create the sql/ directory in the build dir if it >>>> doesn't exist. This is only a problem if a pg_regress suite only runs >>>> stuff from input/, because otherwise the sql/ dir already exists in the >>>> source. >>> >>> +1 for having pg_regress create the sql/ directory when it does not >>> exist. Current behavior is annoying when modules having only tests in >>> input/... >> >> >> >> >> That seems like a separate issue. I think Peter should commit his patch >> and backpatch it immediately, and we can deal with the missing sql directory >> when someone sends in a patch. > > > > What's happened on this? Nothing has been committed, and as far as I understood this patch could have been simply pushed... -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: