Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQYim-=PBHa19p04wSBbgGT=+ts1qWeQj2FG9HSmBX78Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:32 PM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote: > On 2/23/16 2:17 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> As a continuation of the thread firstly dedicated to SCRAM: >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/55192AFE.6080106@iki.fi >> Here is a new thread aimed at gathering all the ideas of this previous >> thread and aimed at clarifying a bit what has been discussed until now >> regarding password protocols, verifiers, and SCRAM itself. > > > It looks like this patch set is a bit out of date. > > When applying 0004: > > $ git apply > ../other/0004-Remove-password-verifiers-for-unsupported-protocols-.patch > error: patch failed: src/bin/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade.c:262 > error: src/bin/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade.c: patch does not apply > > Then I tried to build with just 0001-0003: > > cd /postgres/src/include/catalog && '/usr/bin/perl' ./duplicate_oids > 3318 > 3319 > 3320 > 3321 > 3322 > make[3]: *** [postgres.bki] Error 1 > > Could you provide an updated set of patches for review? Meanwhile I am > marking this as "waiting for author". Sure. I'll provide them shortly with all the comments addressed. Up to now I just had a couple of comments about docs and whitespaces, so I didn't really bother sending a new set, but this meritates a rebase. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: