Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQYVuG=1npOi8cpbKrOr+Uj2JNeOBJrVqGTJ30kanH1Dg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> I just realized another problem: We recently learned the hard way that some >> people have files in the data directory that are not writeable by the >> 'postgres' user >> (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150523172627.GA24277@msg.df7cb.de). >> pg_rewind will try to overwrite all files it doesn't recognize as relation >> files, so it's going to fail on those. A straightforward fix would be to >> first open the destination file in read-only mode, and compare its contents, >> and only open the file in write mode if it has changed. It would still fail >> when the files really differ, but I think that's acceptable. > > If I am missing nothing, two code paths need to be patched here: > copy_file_range and receiveFileChunks. copy_file_range is > straight-forward. Now wouldn't it be better to write the contents into > a temporary file, compare their content, and then switch if necessary > for receiveFileChunks? After sleeping on it, I have been looking at this issue again and came up with the patch attached. Instead of checking if the content of the target and the source file are the same, meaning that we would still need to fetch chunk content from the server in stream mode, I think that it is more robust to check if the target file can be opened and check for EACCES on failure, bypassing it if process does not have permissions on it. the patch contains a test case as well, and is independent on the rest sent upthread. Thoughts? -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: