Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQYGnr_d-QJgCBr_7cxediv8zk29pBC5az=PSz1h+=7kQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: >> As it is, there are backup solutions which *do* check the checksum when >> backing up PG. This is no longer, thankfully, some hypothetical thing, >> but something which really exists and will hopefully keep users from >> losing data. > > Wouldn't that have issues with torn pages? Why? What do you foresee here? I would think such backup solutions are careful enough to ensure correctly the durability of pages so as they are not partially written. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: