Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQOaUgczXUaezFT7TJARDyAXok8+edjOoay__wf525-qA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier >> pqWait is internal to libpq, so we are free to set up what we want here. >> Still I think that we should be consistent with what pqSocketCheck returns: > > Please let this what it is now for the same reason Robert mentioned. > >> + int ret = 0; >> + int timeout = 0; >> The declaration of "ret" should be internal in the for(;;) loop. > > Done. > >> + /* Attempt connection to the next host, starting the >> connect_timeout timer */ >> + pqDropConnection(conn, true); >> + conn->addr_cur = conn->connhost[conn->whichhost].addrlist; >> + conn->status = CONNECTION_NEEDED; >> + finish_time = time(NULL) + timeout; >> + } >> I think that it would be safer to not set finish_time if >> conn->connect_timeout is NULL. I agree that your code works because >> pqWaitTimed() will never complain on timeout reached if finish_time is -1. >> That's for robustness sake. > > Done, but I'm not sure how this contributes to the robustness. I guess you were concerned just in case pqWaitTimed() returned0 (timeout) even when it should not. Thanks for the updated patch. This looks good to me. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: