Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQN5X-eP4fP7sjf8zDmZ=czZM+k6peaihje+YhqUbqAdA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I just helped another person yesterday who deleted their pg_xlog. > > The biggest reason I've seen pg_xlog get deleted is not because it's > called pg_xlog, but because it's located someplace other than under > the data directory and referenced via a symlink. Renaming it might > still make it less likely for people to get trigger happy, though. FWIW, I have seen a couple of times the same pattern as Craig: "because it contains log in its name implies that removing it causes no harm". -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: