Re: Re: Why not to use 'pg_ctl start -D ../data' to register posgtresql windows service
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: Why not to use 'pg_ctl start -D ../data' to register posgtresql windows service |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB7nPqQKFfxtyvhF62Jt+wYfjydJUAtRSdXY=FV5iMiSDUNLjQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: Why not to use 'pg_ctl start -D ../data' to register posgtresql windows service (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why not to use 'pg_ctl start -D ../data' to register posgtresql
windows service
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:27 PM, YuanyuanLiu <liuyuanyuangogo@gmail.com> wrote: >> When we registered postgresql windows service named "postgres-9.4", >> we can start the postgresql server by manually starting the windows service >> , runing command "net stop postgres-9.4" (need user with administrator >> privilege), or runing command "pg_ctl start -D ../path/to/data". I think you mean "net start" to start the server here and not "net stop". > Yep. Those are two examples to stop a registered service. You could > use "sc stop postgres-9.4" as well. Note also that when a service > registered is stopped with pg_ctl, SCM will recognize that the service > has been stopped. Er... I interpreted "start" by "stop" reading your last sentence. Please ignore this paragraph. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: