Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
>>> My biggest gripe with it at the moment is that the signature size should be
>>> expressed in bits, and then internally rounded up to a multiple of 16,
>>> rather than having it be expressed in 'uint16'.
>>> If that were done it would be easier to fix the documentation to be more
>>> understandable.
>
>> +1 ... that sort of definition seems much more future-proof, too.
>> IMO it's not too late to change this.  (We probably don't want to change
>> the on-disk representation of the reloptions, but we could convert from
>> bits to words in bloptions().)
>
> There were no objections to this, but also no action.  Attached is a draft
> patch ... any complaints?

None. This looks rather sane to me.
-- 
Michael