Re: Improving replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Improving replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQCsZWsw5WVB2RsaHAQPDa6L5xHgiEC-BDsq68nZvGThw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Improving replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records  (Vladimir Borodin <root@simply.name>)
Ответы Re: Improving replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Vladimir Borodin <root@simply.name> wrote:
> Let’s do immediately after you will send a new version of your patch? Or
> even better after testing your patch? Don’t get me wrong, but rejecting my
> patch without tangible work on your patch may lead to forgiving about the
> problem before 9.6 freeze.

This makes sense. Let's not reject this patch yet if the alternative
approach is not committed.
--
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Small patch for pgstat.c: fix comment + pgindent
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Explain [Analyze] produces parallel scan for select Into table statements.