Re: Speedup twophase transactions
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQ=oVpjQvWnzvRa9_TuhSdK0oXESG87987Qq_f0vmEWeg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speedup twophase transactions (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Performance tests for me show that the patch is effective; my results match > Jesper's roughly in relative numbers. > > My robustness review is that the approach and implementation are safe. > > It's clear there are various additional tuning opportunities, but the > objective of the current patch to improve performance is very, very clearly > met, so I'm aiming to commit *this* patch soon. - /* initialize LSN to 0 (start of WAL) */ - gxact->prepare_lsn = 0; + /* initialize LSN to InvalidXLogRecPtr */ + gxact->prepare_start_lsn = InvalidXLogRecPtr; + gxact->prepare_end_lsn = InvalidXLogRecPtr; I think that it would be better to explicitly initialize gxact->ondisk to false here. + xlogreader = XLogReaderAllocate(&logical_read_local_xlog_page, NULL); + if (!xlogreader) + ereport(ERROR, + (errcode(ERRCODE_OUT_OF_MEMORY), + errmsg("out of memory"), + errdetail("Failed while allocating an XLog reading processor."))); Depending on something that is part of logical decoding to decode WAL is not a good idea. If you want to move on with this approach, you should have a dedicated function. Even better, it would be nice to come up with a generic function used by both 2PC and logical decoding. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: