Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQ=aR32HrNwRZM3DR6i5etER+3yM8__uRFrSfeGRFGBfw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > 1. The performance gain is huge. > 2. It's almost useless because we can only see the postgres command line with Process Explorer, which the user must downloadfrom Microsoft and install. > 3. I don't see the benefit of update_process_title=on at the expense of performance. > 4. The default setting of PostgreSQL parameters should be friendly. I'm afraid many users cannot track the cause of poorperformance to update_process_title. I heard that MySQL's popularity was partly because it ran smoothly on Windows inthe early days. PostgreSQL should be, too. > > The question is, do we want to change the default to off on other OSes? I don't think so. > Is the command line really useful? > If useful, does it need to be on by default? I'd vote for keeping it on by default, because this information with ps is really useful for any kind of deployments, testing, etc. Here is a different proposal: documenting instead that disabling that parameter on Windows can improve performance, at the cost of losing information verbosity for processes. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: