Re: [GENERAL] pg_rewind issue

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:36 PM, James Sewell <james.sewell@jirotech.com> wrote:
> When Iook at timeline 15 I see this:
>
> 20      C74/45000000    no recovery target specified+

This refers to timeline 20. Are there other entries in this history
file? Isn't timeline 15 a direct parent of timeline 20?

> As 0000001500000C73000000A9 > 0000001500000C7400000044  I'm confused why
> this WAL would be required? It's never been created on either server
> (although the same suffix does exist in timeline 14).

Your math is incorrect here. For me 0000001500000C73000000A9 <
0000001500000C7400000044, C73 being generated *before* C74.

> The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or
> professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this
> email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this
> communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or
> otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your
> incorrect receipt of this correspondence.

The contents of this mailing list are public.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general