Re: pg_config --version
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_config --version |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQ5D6WYp2dWunSsvFT+kYcpsrBHZPZyU51DdvervSN+eQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_config --version (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_config --version
Re: pg_config --version |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 9:16 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: > While updating some extensions, I noticed that pg_config --version > produces output that's...maybe not quite as useful as it might be, at > least to a machine, so I'd like to throw out some proposals to fix the > situation. > > Add a --version-numeric option to pg_config > > or > Replace the current --version option with its bare numeric version > > or > Add another line of output to the current --version output, which > would be the numeric version by itself > > What say? You may want to look at this thread that treats more or less the same topic: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTAdAJpX8iK4V3uYJbO2Kmo8rHzqJKDsLaDdranNrGX_A@mail.gmail.com And this has resulted in commit a5d489cc: commit: a5d489ccb7e613c7ca3be6141092b8c1d2c13fa7 author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:24:36 -0400 Make numeric form of PG version number readily available in Makefiles. I would imagine that the common position has not changed much since, and as Makefile.global.in provides this data... Doing more work in pg_config is not really necessary for extensions. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: