Re: PostgreSQL Failback without rebuild
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Failback without rebuild |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQ4ZBka0aizMxq5ZwFS1rZS2419morDs9_kVLanKXxNPQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Failback without rebuild (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Failback without rebuild
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:30 AM, James Sewell <james.sewell@lisasoft.com> >> I've seen some proposals and a tool (pg_rewind), but all seem to have draw >> backs. > > As far as I remember, one of the main drawbacks for pg_rewind was related to > hint bits which can be avoided by wal_log_hints. pg_rewind is not part of > core > PostgreSQL code, however if you wish, you can try that tool to see if can it > solve your purpose. For 9.3, pg_rewind is only safe with page checksums enabled. For 9.4, yes wal_log_hints or checksums is mandatory. The code contains as well some safety checks as well to ensure that a node not using those parameters cannot be rewinded. Regards, -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: