Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the current set of patches, the sha2 functions would not get used
> until the main patch for SCRAM gets committed so that's a couple of
> steps and many months ahead.. And --as-needed/--no-as-needed are not
> supported in macos. So I would believe that the best route is just to
> use this patch with the way it does things, and once SCRAM gets in we
> could switch the build into more appropriate linking. At least that's
> far less ugly than having fake objects in the backend code. Of course
> a comment in pgcrypo's Makefile would be appropriate.

Or a comment with a "ifeq ($(PORTNAME), darwin)" containing the
additional objects to make clear that this is proper to only OSX.
Other ideas are welcome.
-- 
Michael