Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQ0mok+6VkJ06xdB74pgqbuAOnwkHvmBWQWU58bsSPOVg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > I gave this a quick run, to see if my compiler would complain for things > like this: > > bool isprimary = flags & INDEX_CREATE_IS_PRIMARY; > > (taken from the first patch at > https://postgr.es/m/20171023161503.ohkybquxrlech7d7@alvherre.pgsql ) > > which is assigning a value other than 1/0 to a bool variable without an > explicit cast. I thought it would provoke a warning, but it does not. > Is that expected? Is my compiler too old/new? It seems to me that this proves the point of the proposed patch. You had better use a zero-equality comparison for such bitwise operation, and so you ought to do that: bool isprimary = (flags & INDEX_CREATE_IS_PRIMARY) != 0; -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: