Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix connection leak in DROP SUBSCRIPTION command.
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix connection leak in DROP SUBSCRIPTION command. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQ0Gyaf9yQPzofVt=R3CUxZ_tAAuViMj5qkXASoSPUNaA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix connection leak in DROP SUBSCRIPTION command. (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix connection leak in DROP SUBSCRIPTION command.
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Fujii Masao <fujii@postgresql.org> writes: >>>> Fix connection leak in DROP SUBSCRIPTION command. >>>> Previously the command forgot to close the connection to the publisher >>>> when it failed to drop the replication slot. >>> >>> If there's a bug here, this seems like an extremely unreliable way of >>> fixing it. What if an error gets thrown before you reach that ereport? >>> >>> In other words, this coding is assuming that the walrcv_command() >>> subroutine cannot throw an error, > > Yes, but I agree that walrcv_command() may be changed in the future so that > an error is thrown and current coding is not reliable in that case. > >>> which I would consider dangerous >>> even if it were a fixed subroutine. If it's a hook that's doing >>> unknown stuff, that seems a completely untenable assumption. You >>> really need either to hook the cleanup action into normal error >>> recovery, or to use a PG_TRY block. >> >> To be honest, I have thought about using PG_ENSURE_ERROR_CLEANUP() >> when seeing the thread. If other ERROR messages are generated in the >> future that the current fix would be unreliable. > > What about the attached patch? Thanks for the patch. That looks good to me. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: