Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warning in costsize.c
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warning in costsize.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQ-J30X71Upn=W-118s7gwRz07Rn14OawdGkr6jGptgRw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warning in costsize.c (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warning in costsize.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> (I'm personally not that much in love with PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY, >>> because it tends to confuse pgindent.) >> >> I would be incline to just do that, any other solution I can think of >> is uglier than that. > > Actually, no. Looking at this issue again the warning is triggered > because the Assert() clause is present in USE_ASSERT_CHECKING. So > instead of removing PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY, here is a more simple > patch that fixes the problem. No need to put the variable *rte within > ifdefs as well. Bah. This actually fixes nothing. Attached is a different patch that really addresses the problem, by removing the variable because we don't want planner_rt_fetch() to run for non-Assert builds. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: