Re: Tripping over (my own) stupidity - VARCHAR declaration minus specificity
От | Adam Cornett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tripping over (my own) stupidity - VARCHAR declaration minus specificity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB5sPxZbF6RPdZdPVFhXYCmPf-mnHhkWit5LVe2PZPAo0EVF1A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tripping over (my own) stupidity - VARCHAR declaration minus specificity ("ktm@rice.edu" <ktm@rice.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tripping over (my own) stupidity - VARCHAR declaration
minus specificity
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:09 PM, ktm@rice.edu <ktm@rice.edu> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:51:04PM -0400, Adam Cornett wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Good, Thomas <TGood@svwsjmc.org> wrote:
>
> > I created a table in a hurry and forgot to specify the max capacity for a
> > varchar() data type.
> > Can it be said what the max would be in a case like this (just curious)?
> >
> > thanks much
> >
>> According toAnd according to the documentation, the maximum size of a varchar is
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-character.html,
> "If character varying is used without length specifier, the type accepts
> strings of any size. The latter is a PostgreSQL extension."
>
> -Adam Cornett
1GB.
Regards,
Ken
Yes, 1GB is the limit for any column size. From what I can tell a varchar without a size specified acts just like text.
-Adam
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: