Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
От | Krunal Bauskar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB10pyYiPQeabqbK7jqOOfJqJqsDq84hFBzCFfUwJtABjsDL2A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
scalability baseline patched
----------- --------- ----------
update tpcb update tpcb
--------------------------------------------------------------
128 107932 78554 108081 78569
256 82877 64682 101543 73774
512 55174 46494 77886 61105
1024 32267 27020 33170 30597
configuration: https://github.com/mysqlonarm/benchmark-suites/blob/master/pgsql-pbench/conf/pgsql.cnf/postgresql.conf
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 10:36, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:00:50AM +0530, Krunal Bauskar wrote:
> (Thanks to Amit Khandekar for rigorously performance testing this patch
> with different combinations).
For the simple-update and tpcb-like graphs, do you have any actual
numbers to share between 128 and 1024 connections? The blue lines
look like they are missing some measurements in-between, so it is hard
to tell if this is an actual improvement or just some lack of data.
--
Michael
Regards,
Krunal Bauskar
Krunal Bauskar
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: