Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
| От | Marcos Pegoraro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB-JLwaVjXzYJxZVbEQuOjNRYz+1XLE-V5oZsT0DAqNJQgUbXw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] (Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em qui., 25 de set. de 2025 às 18:31, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> escreveu:
This pattern is used because you can pass more than one argument, for
example, something like
I know that
While I agree that the wording is a little awkward, this follows the same
pattern as pg_dump and friends.
well, I think pg_dump looks wrong too. Because if you explain that it's a
single table or single schema on docs, why you write on plural on usage ?
+ Repack or analyze all tables in
+ <replaceable class="parameter">schema</replaceable> only. Multiple
+ schemas can be repacked by writing multiple <option>-n</option>
+ switches.
+ <replaceable class="parameter">schema</replaceable> only. Multiple
+ schemas can be repacked by writing multiple <option>-n</option>
+ switches.
instead of
+ printf(_(" -n, --schema=SCHEMA repack tables in the specified schema(s) only\n"));
maybe this ?
+ printf(_(" -n, --schema=SCHEMA repack tables in the specified schema, can be used several times\n"));
regards
Marcos
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: