Re: Trigger position
| От | Marcos Pegoraro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Trigger position |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB-JLwaQsqw7BZZ0bcTd+uckyv2v8LR2OP-kwSRrVu6_u=nwsw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Trigger position (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
This way would be interesting for those are migrating from these databases too. But ok, I´ll forget it.
Em qua., 15 de set. de 2021 às 08:40, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br> writes:
> Alphabetical order of triggers sometimes makes me write a_Recalc or z_Calc
> to be sure it´ll be the first or the last trigger with same event of that
> table
> Oracle and SQL Server have FOLLOWS and PRECEDES when defining trigger
> execution order. Firebird has POSITION, which I like it more.
Color me skeptical: doesn't that introduce more complication without
fundamentally solving anything? You still don't know which position
numbers other triggers have used, so it seems like this is just a
different way to spell the same problem.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: