Replication and fsync
От | maillists0@gmail.com |
---|---|
Тема | Replication and fsync |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB+OxSBeHZ15u0baKKEuNf2EgCy-Szu3tVcCq2+_awi2V60fYw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Replication and fsync
Re: Replication and fsync Re: Replication and fsync |
Список | pgsql-general |
Newb question.
I'm running 9.1 with a slave using streaming replication. A coworker wants to turn off fsync on the master and insists that the slave will still be in a usable state if there is a failure on the master. We all know that turning off fsync is a bad idea, but I was under the impression that the fsync setting would be replicated to the slave, making it useless as a backup in this scenario. Am I wrong? If I'm wrong, is there still danger to the slave in this kind of setup? Can I count on it remaining unharmed if the master suffers unrecoverable corruption?В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: