Missing warning on revokes with grant options

Hi Hackers,

I noticed some confusing behavior with REVOKE recently. Normally if
REVOKE fails to revoke anything a warning is printed. For example, see
the following scenario:

```
test=# SELECT current_role;
 current_role
--------------
 joe
(1 row)

test=# CREATE ROLE r1;
CREATE ROLE
test=# CREATE TABLE t ();
CREATE TABLE
test=# GRANT SELECT ON TABLE t TO r1;
GRANT
test=# SET ROLE r1;
SET
test=> REVOKE SELECT ON TABLE t FROM r1;
WARNING:  no privileges could be revoked for "t"
WARNING:  no privileges could be revoked for column "tableoid" of relation "t"
WARNING:  no privileges could be revoked for column "cmax" of relation "t"
WARNING:  no privileges could be revoked for column "xmax" of relation "t"
WARNING:  no privileges could be revoked for column "cmin" of relation "t"
WARNING:  no privileges could be revoked for column "xmin" of relation "t"
WARNING:  no privileges could be revoked for column "ctid" of relation "t"
REVOKE
test=> SELECT relacl FROM pg_class WHERE relname = 't';
           relacl            
-----------------------------
 {joe=arwdDxtm/joe,r1=r/joe}
(1 row)

```

However, if the REVOKE fails and the revoker has a grant option on the
privilege, then no warning is emitted. For example, see the following
scenario:

```
test=# SELECT current_role;
 current_role
--------------
 joe
(1 row)

test=# CREATE ROLE r1;
CREATE ROLE
test=# CREATE TABLE t ();
CREATE TABLE
test=# GRANT SELECT ON TABLE t TO r1 WITH GRANT OPTION;
GRANT
test=# SET ROLE r1;
SET
test=> REVOKE SELECT ON TABLE t FROM r1;
REVOKE
test=> SELECT relacl FROM pg_class WHERE relname = 't';
            relacl            
------------------------------
 {joe=arwdDxtm/joe,r1=r*/joe}
(1 row)

```
The warnings come from restrict_and_check_grant() in aclchk.c. The
psuedo code is

  if (revoked_privileges & available_grant_options == 0)
    emit_warning()

In the second example, `r1` does have the proper grant options so no
warning is emitted. However, the revoke has no actual effect.

Reading through the docs [0], I'm not actually sure if the REVOKE
in the second example should succeed or not. At first it says:

> A user can only revoke privileges that were granted directly by that
> user. If, for example, user A has granted a privilege with grant
> option to user B, and user B has in turn granted it to user C, then
> user A cannot revoke the privilege directly from C.

Which seems pretty clear that you can only revoke privileges that you
directly granted. However later on it says:

> As long as some privilege is available, the command will proceed, but
>it will revoke only those privileges for which the user has grant
> options.
...
> while the other forms will issue a warning if grant options for any
> of the privileges specifically named in the command are not held.

Which seems to imply that you can revoke a privilege as long as you
have a grant option on that privilege.

Either way I think the REVOKE should either fail and emit a warning

- Joe Koshakow

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-revoke.html