Re: Fix overflow in DecodeInterval
От | Joseph Koshakow |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fix overflow in DecodeInterval |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAvxfHdrQc8pVoSnTPBfTKzHQzmYTg1qheNxMLoWDcrWpTJapg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fix overflow in DecodeInterval (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fix overflow in DecodeInterval
Re: Fix overflow in DecodeInterval |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 10:51 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > Any reason for using int return types? > > particularly since the pg_*_overflow stuff uses bool? I chose int return types to keep all these methods consistent with DecodeInterval, which returns a non-zero int to indicate an error. Though I wasn't sure if an int or bool would be best, so I'm happy to change to bool if people think that's better. Also I'm realizing now that I've incorrectly been using the number of the patch to indicate the version, instead of just sticking a v3 to the front. So sorry about that, all the patches I sent in this thread are the same patch, just different versions. - Joe Koshakow
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: