Re: pgindent run
| От | David Rowley |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgindent run |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAApHDvroSMY2Kva-kQqFB+1dCbLTGu5L9eyeSr20dv87eA4wHQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pgindent run (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgindent run
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 00:29, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Here's the diff from a pgindent run.
--- a/src/backend/commands/policy.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/policy.c
@@ -587,65 +587,65 @@ RemoveRoleFromObjectPolicy(Oid roleid, Oid
classid, Oid policy_id)
/* If any roles remain, update the policy entry. */
if (num_roles > 0)
{
- /* This is the array for the new tuple */
- role_ids = construct_array(role_oids, num_roles, OIDOID,
- sizeof(Oid), true, TYPALIGN_INT);
+ /* This is the array for the new tuple */
+ role_ids = construct_array(role_oids, num_roles, OIDOID,
+ sizeof(Oid), true, TYPALIGN_INT);
I wasn't too sure about the status of this one. Michael did mention it
in [1], but Tom mentioned that was on purpose to ease backpatching.
I'm not too clear on if Tom intended it should stay unindented until
"rewriting that whole function in a little bit".
David
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/YM0puvBnbBIZxJt2@paquier.xyz
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: