Re: pgindent run
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgindent run |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAApHDvroSMY2Kva-kQqFB+1dCbLTGu5L9eyeSr20dv87eA4wHQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgindent run (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgindent run
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 00:29, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > Here's the diff from a pgindent run. --- a/src/backend/commands/policy.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/policy.c @@ -587,65 +587,65 @@ RemoveRoleFromObjectPolicy(Oid roleid, Oid classid, Oid policy_id) /* If any roles remain, update the policy entry. */ if (num_roles > 0) { - /* This is the array for the new tuple */ - role_ids = construct_array(role_oids, num_roles, OIDOID, - sizeof(Oid), true, TYPALIGN_INT); + /* This is the array for the new tuple */ + role_ids = construct_array(role_oids, num_roles, OIDOID, + sizeof(Oid), true, TYPALIGN_INT); I wasn't too sure about the status of this one. Michael did mention it in [1], but Tom mentioned that was on purpose to ease backpatching. I'm not too clear on if Tom intended it should stay unindented until "rewriting that whole function in a little bit". David [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/YM0puvBnbBIZxJt2@paquier.xyz
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: