Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAApHDvrOrvY3j3uMaa8hVCyAzNKZuDZK-2dNe3zm-u+VB=QGkw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw (Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io>) |
Ответы |
Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 19:00, Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io> wrote: > Please find it reattached. +-- This will not be pushed either +explain verbose select * from ft2 order by c1 using operator(public.<^); + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Sort (cost=190.83..193.33 rows=1000 width=142) Can you also use explain (verbose, costs off) the same as the other tests in that area. Having the costs there would never survive a run of the buildfarm. Different hardware will produce different costs, e.g 32-bit hardware might cost cheaper due to narrower widths. History lesson: costs off was added so we could test plans. Before that, I don't think that the regression tests had any coverage for plans. Older test files still likely lack much testing with EXPLAIN. David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: