On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 02:52, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
> There was one small typo keeping this from compiling. Also a repeated
> word. I've fixed these. I also edited a bit of indentation and tweaked
> some wording. Diff attached (to be applied on top of your diff).
Thanks for fixing that mistake.
For reference, I had changed things to end lines early so that the
glossterm tags could be on a line of their own without breaking to a
new line. The rest of the file seems to be done that way, so I thought
we'd better stick to it.
I swapped out "associated WAL" for "unflushed WAL". I didn't agree
that the WAL that would be flushed would have any particular
association with the to-be-written page.
I dropped CTAS since I didn't see any other mention in the docs about
that. I could maybe see the sense in making reference to the
abbreviated form if we were going to mention it again and didn't want
to spell the whole thing out each time, but that's not the case here.
I pushed the result.
David