Re: Should we document how column DEFAULT expressions work?
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we document how column DEFAULT expressions work? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAApHDvqxraGnZGy2Aa+r2X7-BgrdkcmUFs=9UOfQoR2B+i2WaA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should we document how column DEFAULT expressions work? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we document how column DEFAULT expressions work?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 02:43, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'd be more excited about this discussion if I didn't think that > the chances of removing 'now'::timestamp are exactly zero. You > can't just delete useful decades-old features, whether there's > a better way or not. Do you have any thoughts on rejecting trailing punctuation with the timestamp special values? For me, I've mixed feelings about it. I think it would be good to break things for people who are doing this and getting the wrong behaviour who haven't noticed yet, however, there could be a series of people doing this and have these embedded in statements that are parsed directly before execution, and they just happen to get the right behaviour. It might be better not to upset the latter set of people needlessly. Perhaps the former set of people don't exist since the behaviour is quite different and it seems quite obviously wrong. David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: