Re: Performance degradation on concurrent COPY into a single relation in PG16.

On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 03:50, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2023-07-25 23:37:08 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 17:34, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > I've not really studied the fix_COPY_DEFAULT.patch patch.  Is there a
> > reason to delay committing that?  It would be good to eliminate that
> > as a variable for the current performance regression.
>
> Yea, I don't think there's a reason to hold off on that. Sawada-san, do you
> want to commit it? Or Andrew?

Just to keep this moving and to make it easier for people to test the
pg_strtoint patches, I've pushed the fix_COPY_DEFAULT.patch patch.
The only thing I changed was to move the line that was allocating the
array to a location more aligned with the order that the fields are
defined in the struct.

David