Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates

On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 23:45, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote:
> The question not answered is if *argno* can '>=' that pertrans->numTransInputs,
> before entering the loop?
> If *can*, the loop might be useless in that case.
>
>>
>>
>> Note that we're doing argno++ inside the loop.
>
> Another question is, if *argno* can '>' that pertrans->numTransInputs,
> before the loop, the test will fail?
> if (argno == pertrans->numTransInputs)

argno is *always* 0 before the loop starts.

David