Re: A performance issue with Memoize
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A performance issue with Memoize |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAApHDvpc=BgW0iSjvcQg-tf05Pd7-rcjccFzJsGiDe0srDG8Tg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | A performance issue with Memoize (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: A performance issue with Memoize
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 09:41, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: > > I've adjusted the comments to what you mentioned and also leaned out > > the pretty expensive test case to something that'll run much faster > > and pushed the result. > > drongo and fairywren are consistently failing the test case added > by this commit. I'm not quite sure why the behavior of Memoize > would be platform-specific when we're dealing with integers, > but ... Maybe snprintf(buf, "%.*f", 0, 5.0 / 2.0); results in "3" on those rather than "2"? Looking at the code in fmtfloat(), we fallback on the built-in snprintf. I can try changing the unique1 < 5 to unique1 < 4 to see that's more stable. David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: