Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAApHDvpWmpqYrKwwDQyeDq8dAyK7GMNaxDhrG69CkSuXoEg+Vg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill) (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 19:21, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you. Pushed. I'm unsure yet if this has caused an instability on lousyjack's run in [1]. I see that table does have 30,000 rows inserted, so it does seem probable that it may receive an autovacuum now when didn't before. I did a quick local test to see if swapping the "ANALYZE pagg_tab_ml;" to "VACUUM ANALYZE pagg_tab_ml;" would do the same on my local machine, but it didn't. I'll keep an eye on lousyjack's next run. If it passes next run, I may add some SQL to determine if pg_stat_all_tables.autovacuum_count for those tables are varying between passing and failing runs. David [1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=lousyjack&dt=2020-03-28%2006%3A33%3A02
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: