On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 18:26, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I propose the attached which gets rid of the not-so-great casting
> method that was originally added to this test to try and force the seq
> scan. It seems a little dangerous to put in hacks like that to force
> a particular plan when the resulting plan ends up penalized with a
> (1.0e10) disable_cost. The planner is just not going to be stable
> when the plan includes such a large penalty. To force the planner,
> I've added another test step to do set enable_seqscan to true and
> adjusted the permutations to run that just before preparing the seq
> scan query.
Pushed and backpatched to 13, where incremental sorts were added.
David