Re: Why is parula failing?
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is parula failing? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAApHDvpNhN9D1dqwnQ1fyPU+_MMuHapZyhPJyb1PJpBWzKcjbA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why is parula failing? (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why is parula failing?
Re: Why is parula failing? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 15:48, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > Still no partition_prune failures on master since the compiler version > change. There has been one [1] in REL_16_STABLE. I'm thinking it > might be worth backpatching the partition_prune debug to REL_16_STABLE > to see if we can learn anything new from it. Master failed today for the first time since the compiler upgrade. Again reltuples == 48. https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=parula&dt=2024-04-10%2000%3A27%3A02 David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: