On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 01:07, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213@163.com> wrote:
> I find the following code in DiscreteKnapsack is weird.
>
>
> for (i = 0; i <= max_weight; ++i)
> {
> values[i] = 0;
>
> ** memory allocation here, and the num_items bit is removed later **
>
> sets[i] = bms_make_singleton(num_items);
> }
>
>
> ** num_items bit is removed here **
> result = bms_del_member(bms_copy(sets[max_weight]), num_items);
It does not seem weird to me. If the set is going to have multiple
words then adding a member 1 higher than the highest we'll ever add
ensures the set has enough words and we don't need to repalloc to grow
the set when we bms_add_member().
David