Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAApHDvofBE-oG998LnEWO6aOrZxnh11BtSOK9uDpjoFwahZ65A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops (Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 20 Sept 2023 at 19:56, Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > What could you say about a different way: hybrid join? In MS SQL Server, > they have such a feature [1], and, according to their description, it > requires low overhead. They start from HashJoin and switch to NestLoop > if the inner input contains too small tuples. It solves the issue, Isn't it? A complexity which you may not be considering here is that Nested Loop joins always preserve the tuple order from the outer side of the join, whereas hash joins will not do this when multi-batching. I've no idea how the SQL Server engineers solved that. David > [1] > https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/sql-server-blog/introducing-batch-mode-adaptive-joins/ba-p/385411
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: