On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 18:28, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> > Unfortunately, REL_16_STABLE does not have the additional debugging,
> > so don't get to know what reltuples was set to.
>
> Let's wait a bit to see if it fails in HEAD ... but if not, would
> it be reasonable to back-patch the additional debugging output?
I think REL_16_STABLE has told us that it's not an auto-vacuum issue.
I'm uncertain what a few more failures in master will tell us aside
from if reltuples == 48 is consistent or if that value is going to
fluctuate.
Let's give it a week and see if it fails a few more times.
David