Re: Why is parula failing?
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is parula failing? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAApHDvoZWAp5cR5yUeXBfGbmSfy8VTZAJQXi8Vzrvds8TkwCYw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Why is parula failing? ("Tharakan, Robins" <tharar@amazon.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why is parula failing?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 21:03, Tharakan, Robins <tharar@amazon.com> wrote: > > > David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: > > It would be good to have log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0 on this machine for a while. > > - Have set log_autovacuum_min_duration=0 on parula and a test run came out okay. > - Also added REL_16_STABLE to the branches being tested (in case it matters here). Thanks for doing that. I see PG_16_STABLE has failed twice already with the same issue. I don't see any autovacuum / autoanalyze in the log, so I guess that rules out auto vacuum activity causing this. Unfortunately, REL_16_STABLE does not have the additional debugging, so don't get to know what reltuples was set to. David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: