Re: Memory settings
От | Hans Schou |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Memory settings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAApBw35G+RPnkYXKzdN4grptG0b8o-StguUk-qY87VcGB0gfag@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Memory settings (Daulat Ram <Daulat.Ram@exponential.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
pg_stat_database.blks_read,
pg_stat_database.blks_hit,
round((pg_stat_database.blks_hit::double precision
/ (pg_stat_database.blks_read
+ pg_stat_database.blks_hit
+1)::double precision * 100::double precision)::numeric, 2) AS cachehitratio
FROM pg_stat_database
WHERE pg_stat_database.datname !~ '^(template(0|1)|postgres)$'::text
ORDER BY round((pg_stat_database.blks_hit::double precision
/ (pg_stat_database.blks_read
+ pg_stat_database.blks_hit
+ 1)::double precision * 100::double precision)::numeric, 2) DESC;
Hi team,
Can you please suggest what will be the suitable memory settings for Postgresql11 if we have 80gb RAM, 16 CPU’s and OS Linux.
If we set 25 % of total RAM then shared_buffers value will be 20GB. Will it be useful or we can set it any random vale like 8g or 12gb.
According to https://pgtune.leopard.in.ua/#/
below are the suggested memory values for 80gb RAM and 16 CPU. I assume the values preferred for effective_cache_size = 60GB and shared_buffers = 20GB are too large.
max_connections = 500
shared_buffers = 20GB
effective_cache_size = 60GB
maintenance_work_mem = 2GB
checkpoint_completion_target = 0.7
wal_buffers = 16MB
default_statistics_target = 100
random_page_cost = 1.1
effective_io_concurrency = 300
work_mem = 6553kB
min_wal_size = 1GB
max_wal_size = 2GB
max_worker_processes = 16
max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 8
max_parallel_workers = 16
Please give your suggestions.
Regards,
Daulat
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: