Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL?
| От | Dmitry Igrishin |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAAfz9KMNPJDKe=2TZ7q3coSGEg8U=8dj2SM=xLkE3KtvhKk3=A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL? (Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna3@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
вс, 15 июл. 2018 г. в 23:51, Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna3@gmail.com>:
1. dbeaver covers many DBMS and even nosql. Many shops are not one product specific. That is definitely a plus.
On the other hand it is hard to support unique features of PostgreSQL in a tool that attempts to cover all the world.
I can't say about DBeaver, but as a rule, cool-abstracted-cross-DBMS-drivers are often limited and don't support many
unique features of a concrete DBMS.
2. Lightweight tool which can run even from command line will be a plus for the product you are thinking to develop.
Yes. In fact, I have a prototype of such a tool, and use it from command line are useful. For example,
if I run it in *compilation* buffer of Emacs, I can easily navigate to the place of error occured at the time of
database/schema deployment.
3. Who cares in what language it is developed?
Many people, in fact. The reasons are different.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: