Re: pgAdmin III commit: Lots of work on domains, and check constraints
От | Timon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Lots of work on domains, and check constraints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAeC-Sv_otFpUJ5pM80094Un+derKdOLxKd8TR7rPwni_MGf-Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Lots of work on domains, and check constraints (Timon <timosha@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgAdmin III commit: Lots of work on domains,
and check constraints
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
and, one more little bug altering index fillfactor produces wrong sql code steps to reproduce: 1. create table 2. add index 3. chage fillfactor on created index 4. got error like "scheme name <table name> doesn't exists" example of sql: ALTER INDEX gallery.idx_gallery_regionid_itemiddesc SET (FILLFACTOR=80); gallery is the table name 2012/8/17 Timon <timosha@gmail.com>: > I tested this patch. It fixes my problem. > Also it fixes one annoying crash when you click on indexes list. > thanks for you work :) > > 2012/7/21 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>: >> On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 10:50 +0600, Timon wrote: >>> seems that this commit broke reindexing of selected index. steps to reproduce: >>> 1) create table >>> 2) create index >>> 3) select index in object inspector >>> 4) try to reindex it via maintenance menu item >>> 5) got error : ERROR: schema "table_name" does not exist >>> >>> and one more crash here >>> .. same steps as before >>> 4) try to CLUSTER index >>> 5) pgadmin simply crashed >>> >> >> OK, I finally got some time to work on this. As Timon said, these bugs >> come from the patch "Lots of work on domains, and check constraints". In >> this patch, I changed some objects parent class from pgTableObject to >> pgSchemaObject. Due to this change, the GetTable() method returns NULL, >> which segfaults all statements that try to use the return value without >> checking. The two examples above from Timon are exactly this. >> >> I don't see many ways to get out of this issue. >> >> We could use GetSchema() instead of GetTable(). It works, it's an easy >> and small patch. But it'll certainly be a maintenance nightmare (at >> least without any comments) >> >> We could also revert my patch. It's simple, we loose the feature of >> adding as many check constraints as we want to a domain, we loose the >> feature of renaming and validating constraints, and we gain a few bugs. >> >> I don't see any other options. My own personal choice would be the first >> one (see attached patch). But it's a tough call. >> >> Comments? >> >> >> -- >> Guillaume >> http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info >> http://www.dalibo.com > > > > -- > All bugs reserved -- All bugs reserved
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: