On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:27 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/03/09 23:19, James Coleman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:17 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2021-Mar-09, James Coleman wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, I think they both agreed on the "DETAIL: Hot standby mode is
> >>> disabled." message, but that alternative meant not needing to add any
> >>> new signals and pm states, correct?
> >>
> >> Ah, I see! I was thinking that you still needed the state and signal in
> >> order to print the correct message in hot-standby mode, but that's
> >> (obviously!) wrong. So you're right that no signal/state are needed.
> >
> > Cool. And yes, I'm planning to update the patch soon.
>
> +1. Thanks!
Here's an updated patch; I think I've gotten what Alvaro suggested.
Thanks,
James