Re: Binary search in ScalarArrayOpExpr for OR'd constant arrays
От | James Coleman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Binary search in ScalarArrayOpExpr for OR'd constant arrays |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAaqYe-UvA4PCsC1Va73e0uASKtxWy_UDW_nq+HeFqz44R_Rrg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Binary search in ScalarArrayOpExpr for OR'd constant arrays (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Binary search in ScalarArrayOpExpr for OR'd constant arrays
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:07 PM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:49 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 11:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > > > David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: > > > > I realised when working on something unrelated last night that we can > > > > also do hash lookups for NOT IN too. > > > > > > ... and still get the behavior right for nulls? > > > > Yeah, it will. There are already some special cases for NULLs in the > > IN version. Those would need to be adapted for NOT IN. > > I hadn't thought about using the negator operator directly that way > when I initially wrote the patch. > > But also I didn't think a whole lot about the NOT IN case at all -- > and there's no mention of such that I see in this thread or the > precursor thread. It's pretty obvious that it wasn't part of my > immediate need, but obviously it'd be nice to have the consistency. > > All that to say this: my vote would be to put it into PG15 also. ...and here's a draft patch. I can take this to a new thread if you'd prefer; the one here already got committed, on the other hand this is pretty strongly linked to this discussion, so I figured it made sense to post it here. James
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: