Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other
От | James Coleman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAaqYe-7n=eZU265QL_=4kueTggx4_Ewh_xgfRYEBrBpQDLyrA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 9:22 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 2019-Sep-28, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > The CREATE INDEX docs already say: > > > > In a concurrent index build, the index is actually entered into > > the system catalogs in one transaction, then two table scans occur in > > two more transactions. Before each table scan, the index build must > > wait for existing transactions that have modified the table to terminate. > > After the second scan, the index build must wait for any transactions > > --> that have a snapshot (see <xref linkend="mvcc"/>) predating the second > > --> scan to terminate. Then finally the index can be marked ready for use, > > > > So, having multiple concurrent index scans is just a special case of > > having to "wait for any transactions that have a snapshot", no? I am > > not sure adding a doc mention of other index builds really is helpful. > > I always thought that create index concurrently was prevented from > running concurrently in a table by the ShareUpdateExclusive lock that's > held during the operation. You mean multiple CICs on a single table at the same time? Yes, that (unfortunately) isn't possible, but I'm concerned in the patch with the fact that CIC on table X blocks CIC on table Y. James
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: