Re: Detecting libpq connections improperly shared via fork()
От | Daniel Farina |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Detecting libpq connections improperly shared via fork() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAZKuFbwJNmjpceZyCizGtdOxRtdMNsBWjZAPy_scb1nUDNQvw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Detecting libpq connections improperly shared via fork() (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Detecting libpq connections improperly shared via fork()
Re: Detecting libpq connections improperly shared via fork() |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Thursday, October 04, 2012 12:08:18 AM Daniel Farina wrote: >> It would be fantastic for libpq to somehow monitor use of a connection >> from multiple PIDs that share a parent and deliver an error indicating >> what is wrong. Unfortunately detecting that would require either a >> file or some kind of shared memory map, AFAIK, and I don't know how >> keen anyone is on accepting that patch. So, may I ask: how keen is >> anyone on accepting such a patch, and under what conditions of >> mechanism? > Hm. An easier version of this could just be storing the pid of the process > that did the PQconnectdb* in the PGconn struct. You can then check that > PGconn->pid == getpid() at relatively few places and error out on a mismatch. > That should be doable with only minor overhead. I suppose this might needlessly eliminate someone who forks and hands off the PGconn struct to exactly one child, but it's hard to argue with its simplicity and portability of mechanism. -- fdr
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: